FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
For the latest updates, go to: www.1021convention.org
The convention will be a transformative event, where members will gain greater clarity, energy, motivation and direction to step more fully into their power, with grace, vision, courage and knowledge. This is an opportunity for chapter building, engaging and developing potential leaders, hence making it a priority for staff and elected officers.
Q: What are the qualifications to be a delegate?
A: To be eligible, a member would have to had paid dues for any 4 months in 2014 as well as either January or February, 2015.
Q: Can fee payers participate in the nomination and/or delegate election process?
A: Yes, once they sign a membership form, then they can nominate and vote.
Q: How many delegates can each Chapter elect?
A: Every Chapter gets 2 delegates automatically. After 300 members, each chapter will have 2 additional delegates. For every additional 150 members, a chapter will have 2 additional delegates.
Q: What is the period of time for completing elections?
A: April 20-July 20, 2015
Q: What is an “uncontested ballot”? (Previously referred to as “white ballot”)
A: When there are more or an equal number of delegate slots as candidates, that is referred to as a uncontested ballot and the chapter does not need to hold a full election.
Q: How are alternate delegates selected?
A: In case a delegate can’t participate due to scheduling, illness, etc. Chapters should select alternates even if the delegate election for that Chapter is uncontested or the Chapter does not elect the full number of delegates which it is entitled to.
Here are the rules for selecting alternates: All Chapters are encouraged to select at least two (2) alternates. Alternates need to be ranked by votes received (e.g. the highest vote total becomes Alternate #1, second highest voted becomes Alternate #2, etc.)
In Chapters with “uncontested ballots” (where there are more or an equal number of delegate slots as there are candidates, thus making an election unnecessary), Chapters are still encouraged to select up to two (2) alternates and designate these as Alternate #1 & #2.
Convention Delegates, who become ineligible or unable to attend, shall notify the 1021 Convention Election Committee in writing no later than 8/20/15. An Alternate or Alternates will then be credentialed and seated. Delegates who notify the 1021 Convention Election Committee after 8/20/15 will not be replaced by an alternate.
Q: Which chapters may select honorary delegates? How will honorary delegates be selected?
A:Workers who have recently organized with Local 1021, but who have not ratified their first collective bargaining agreement may select honorary delegates. The process for selecting honorary delegates will be as follows: two (2) honorary delegates will be elected at upcoming membership meetings.
If you are a Delegate:
Q: How will delegates register for the convention?
A: Once the delegate certification form is turned in, the delegate will be sent a welcome letter by e-mail and mail which gives them directions on how to register. (That is why it is critical that their contact information is on certification form).
Q: Do we pay lost time for delegates attending the Convention?
A: Yes, follow the local’s lost time policy. Anyone working from 12:01am on Saturday through 11:59pm on Sunday will receive lost time.
For example: If a delegate works anytime on Saturday or Sunday they may request lost time. So for instance if a member has a shift that starts 11pm on Friday September 25th but goes to 7am Saturday the 26th they may request the time off for their Friday shift and they would receive lost time per the guidelines specified in the policy.
Q: What are the rules around Friday night hotel stays for delegates?
A: Delegateswho travel 75 miles or more (one way) are qualified for Friday night lodging. All Delegates are entitled to Saturday night lodging (there is no required miles to qualify).
Q: What are the rules around the hotel stay on Saturday evening?
A: All delegates are encouraged to stay at the hotel regardless of how close they live to the venue. The local will pay the cost for double occupancy. Depending on room availability, they may request a single room but would need to pay the additional costs.
Oakland, CA – BART’s largest union, SEIU 1021, ratified its contract with the transit agency today, closing eight months of negotiations. Members voted 87% to approve the contract. On January 2nd, BART’s Board of Directors voted on and ratified the contract with the union after the Directors failed to ratify a complete contract in November.
The four-year contract ratified by SEIU 1021’s members includes reasonable raises and calls for measures that would improve safety and reliability for riders and workers alike. These measures include increased lighting in the tunnels and stations, committees to begin the process of reopening station bathrooms to help improve station cleanliness, and the installment of BART’s first electronic tracking system of notices filed by workers to flag unresolved safety hazards.
“In California we believe in workers having a voice in the workplace in order to improve working conditions and services to the public. This is particularly important at BART and other transportation agencies, where workers have lost their lives on the job, face incredibly dangerous working conditions on a daily basis, and need a voice to make the system safer for the thousands of riders they serve each day,” said Pete Castelli, Executive Director of SEIU 1021.
Earlier today, SB 423, a politically motivated bill that would have stripped transit workers in California of the right to strike, lost traction in the state senate. Modeled after policies in other states that have proven ineffective in preventing strikes, the bill was designed to take away the collective bargaining rights of thousands of transit workers and would have imposed draconian penalties against workers and their unions for striking.
“To strip any workers of their right to strike and limit their ability to improve working conditions and to serve the public is wrong. And today, the Senate Public Employment and Retirement Committee saw SB 423 for what it truly is: wrong on principle and simply bad policy.”
Furthermore, SB 423 would have unduly punished workers, who prefer to negotiate contracts with their employers through compromise and discussion at the bargaining table, and taken away employers’ incentive to bargain in good faith and settle fair agreements with their workers.
“As a community we need to start looking at the real problems at BART, at the lack of responsible leadership from the BART Board of Directors who stalled and derailed contract talks with their workers at every opportunity. As a community we need to demand accountability and make sure that we have leaders who have the interest of riders and working families first.
Oakland, CA – Today, after eight months of contract talks, the BART Board of Directors voted to ratify the labor contract for more than 2,300 workers represented by SEIU 1021 and ATU 1555.
SEIU 1021 Executive Director Pete Castelli released the following statement:
“Today’s Board vote incrementally restores the faith that the riders and workers have lost in the BART Board of Directors, but it’s not enough to fix the damage they’ve caused to our communities.
It’s been an unnecessarily long, tough, and contentious eight months of negotiations, which have been prolonged by the BART Directors’ unwillingness to sit down and bargain fairly with the workers. Over the course of negotiations, the Bay Area has witnessed this Board of Directors throw BART and the Bay Area into chaos by pushing workers out on two strikes and by failing to demand accountability from BART’s General Manager Grace Crunican.
Today BART is less safe and less reliable because of the Directors’ reckless leadership.
Something has to change in order for all of us to regain our confidence in BART, and it starts with having BART Directors who are committed to strengthening the transportation system we all rely on and who prioritize its workers’ and riders’ safety.
We look forward to the opportunity to work with our communities and to elect Directors who are committed to improving service and safety to all who depend on BART.”
Oakland, CA – Today BART’s largest unions, SEIU 1021 and ATU 1555, reached a tentative agreement with BART’s Management’s negotiators on a disputed contract provision on paid family medical leave.
“Today we’re proud to announce that we’ve reached a resolution that we can bring back to our members for a vote,” said SEIU 1021 BART Chapter President John Arantes. “It’s a fair resolution that would close months of drawn out contract talks and—in the interest of the riding public—end the uncertainty caused by the Board’s removal of a section from our final, complete contract.”
“BART Management has been adamant in their admission of a mistake and how they’ve handled the situation,” Arantes continued, “and, in the past few days, we’ve had the opportunity to have meaningful discussion and resolve some of our differences at the bargaining table. We’d also like to thank Greg Lim, from the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Services, who returned to provide valuable assistance.”
“Our ability to address the disputed provision at the bargaining table resulted from BART Management’s negotiators sharing the unions’ commitment to bargain fairly and equitably,” said Des Patten, SEIU 1021 Professional Chapter President. “That’s the way to fix problems, and the way we hope BART Management and the BART Directors would move forward from now on, so that they can restore the lost trust from the riders and from their workers.”
After the BART Board of Directors ratify the contract, the amended version of the strike-ending agreement will be brought before SEIU 1021 and ATU 1555 for a vote. Once the ratified, the contract terms would go into effect.
On November 21st, the BART Board of Directors voted to approve a contract that did not have a provision on family medical leave, that BART’s chief negotiator Thomas Hock, Assistant General Manager Paul Oversier, and Labor Relations Manager Rudy Medina bargained and signed with its unions.
BART workers represented by SEIU 1021 released the following statement in response to the NTSB’s ban on the controversial practice of “simple approval.”
“We welcome the NTSB’s move to ensure that BART and similar transit agencies adopt rules that would ensure the safety of the hard-working men and women who transport hundreds of thousands of riders each day,” said Saul Almanza, a 17-year BART employee who trains workers on trackway safety procedures and protocols. “Workers at BART have repeatedly raised concerns about the procedure known as ‘simple approval’ and how it contributed to the tragic and unnecessary deaths of four trackway personnel.”
We fully agree with NTSB Chairman Hersman that ‘a positive safety culture is not a solo act,’ and we look to BART Management and the Board of Directors to join us in fostering a culture of safety for workers and the riders who depend on us.”
Last month, BART workers testified at a special legislative oversight hearing on BART worker safety and blasted the transit agency for spending hundreds of thousands of dollars fighting Cal-OSHA violations, including violations that contributed to two fatalities. Workers also testified on BART’s alarming record of fighting state safety regulations, instead of fixing the problems identified by workers or reforming procedures to comply with state law.
Today SEIU 1021 released a statement on Director Keller’s move to take away workers’ right to strike.
Director Keller, who is up for re-election this year, proposed a ballot measure to support state legislation which would chip away at workers’ collective bargaining rights by stripping them of the right to strike.
A statement from Pete Castelli, Executive Director of SEIU 1021:
“We condemn Director Keller’s politically motivated move to introduce an advisory ballot measure to strip BART workers’ of the right to strike. This is a smokescreen for the lack of leadership from the Board of Directors and their management team’s irresponsibility.
In these past eight months, the Bay Area has witnessed how BART officials and their high-paid consultants like Thomas Hock have actively pursued a scorched earth policy to dismantle workers’ rights and workers’ ability to improve workplace conditions. They’ve seen how the Board and Management have chosen to disregard workers’ concerns, resulting in a less reliable and more dangerous transportation system.
Riders and the Bay Area have seen how our elected Board has allowed the General Manager to run the system in a reckless manner, without consideration for the riding public or their own employees.
Instead of taking responsibility or demanding accountability, Director Keller prefers to point fingers and blame workers, just as those very workers are in the process of fixing Management’s alleged mistakes. This is not a way to run a train system.”
Today BART’s largest unions, SEIU 1021 and ATU 1555, met with the federal mediator and BART Management regarding the disputed contract provision on paid family medical leave.
Today’s meeting lasted until 8:00 p.m. and will resume tomorrow at noon.
Statement from SEIU 1021 BART Chapter President John Arantes:
“We looked to today’s meeting as an opportunity to reach a fair and equitable resolution to the dispute regarding family medical leave, and we came to the meeting with every intention to reach an agreement with BART Management.
We met with the District today in an effort to do just that, and we will be back to meet tomorrow in an attempt to reach an agreement.”
Statement from BART Professional Chapter Vice President Saul Almanza released the following statement:
“The workers and more importantly, the riders deserve a quick and fair resolution to Management and the BART Board’s decision to unnecessarily prolong contract talks. We expected that General Manager Grace Crunican and BART Management to share in our commitment to reaching an agreement tonight.
It’s with great disappointment to announce that as of this evening, we’ve not reached a resolution to these months of contract talks. However, we remain committed to working towards a resolution that is fair for everyone.”
On December 10th, a formal complaint was filed with the Attorney General’s office against BART Director Robert Raburn for his misuse of public funds for his re-election campaign. Last Thursday, BART workers who were participating in a peaceful protest against the Director Raburn were appalled to learn that he was using BART police officers as private security for his re-election campaign fundraiser at Warehouse 416 in Oakland.
BART police officers serving as security guards at Director Raburn’s personal fundraising event revealed to protesters that they were “on orders” to be at the event.
The complaint charges that Director Raburn is in violation of California Penal Code section 424, which prohibits state and local officers charged with the oversight or disbursement of public funds from using such funds for any purpose not authorized by law. The law prohibits public funds from being used for campaign purposes.
The complaint also requested an investigation from the Attorney General as to whether Director Raburn violated Government Code section 8314, which prohibits state and local elected officers, such as BART directors, from using or permitting others to use public resources for campaign activity. Public resources include any state-compensated time and campaign activities include anything considered a contribution or independent expenditure under state campaign finance law.
Police logs for December 5th also revealed that, while BART police were providing private security to Director Raburn at his campaign fundraising event, a crime was being committed against a rider at a nearby station. A rider reported that a phone was grabbed and stolen from her as she was sitting in a San Francisco-bound train.
“We’ve repeatedly requested greater security for the riders and the workers, particularly in areas with a lot of crime.” said Saul Almanza, a BART worker who was present at the protest. “It’s frustrating to see that Director Raburn would rather use BART police as his private security detail, than prioritize the safety of the riders or the workers who keep BART running.